Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1507

reference
527-tree-1
name
1507
tree-preservation-order

undefined

527-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.013859 50.898411)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.013788 50.898403,-1.013791 50.898417,-1.013801 50.898430,-1.013816 50.898440,-1.013836 50.898447,-1.013858 50.898449,-1.013880 50.898447,-1.013900 50.898441,-1.013916 50.898431,-1.013926 50.898419,-1.013930 50.898405,-1.013927 50.898391,-1.013917 50.898378,-1.013901 50.898368,-1.013882 50.898361,-1.013860 50.898359,-1.013838 50.898361,-1.013818 50.898367,-1.013802 50.898377,-1.013792 50.898390,-1.013788 50.898403)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL